Subject	Been posting this all day along :) ( lol )
Posted by	ZBlacktt on January 06, 2003 at 12:56 AM
	This message has been viewed 39 times.
In Reply To	You said the key phrase posted by SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) on January 06, 2003 at 12:42 AM
Message	No stock motor Z with it's stock compression is going to run those numbers in total stock format at those boost levels. You can talk all you want and say anything you'd like. But since where dealing with 3.1L motors now with new to somewhat new compression ( depending on when built ), there's not much of a surprise and I commend him for just clarifying that small but big factor. Same with the other guy this morning running the J-Spec motor that came with a triple plate HKS clutch when he bought it. Good buy I'm sure, but no one is using a 1000Hp clutch on a fully stock motor with stock turbo's. But again now his story is being shot by this guy who posted this post. Guy with the J-Spec dyno said ( go see posts ) he was running 14-15psi and getting 380rwhp, now this guy that posted this said he seen 20psi on other guys runs. Seems like the rhyme to all this reason and it only took half a day to figure it out ;) Just what I'm seeing/reading :) STAGE V++++ Going to XIII and beyond :)
Follow Ups	Dyno results! Best stock turbo rwhp! - GRVNZ 22:11:42 01/05/03 Sounds great and all, but the proof is in the paper. - AshsZ (FABio) 22:13:29 01/05/03 No Problem! - GRVNZ 22:32:26 01/05/03 Dyno results can vary - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 22:30:12 01/05/03 16psi - GRVNZ 22:40:59 01/05/03 I would question the state of that dyno - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 23:06:17 01/05/03 My fault it was 1.16bar! (n/m) - GRVNZ 23:11:24 01/05/03 So that's 16.8 (n/m) - SeedyROM 23:25:15 01/05/03 I think that Dyno shop needs to calibrate there machine :) - ZBlacktt 23:36:13 01/05/03 Not enough knowledge to be skeptic... - GRVNZ 00:04:25 01/06/03 Whatever dude,,,, not buying it. (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:08:53 01/06/03 well i would buy - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:12:42 01/06/03 Re: well i would buy - BigRob 00:35:34 01/06/03 oversize pistons? So your compression is not stock? (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:37:51 01/06/03 and please, don't think where ( I'm bashing anyone ) :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 00:38:55 01/06/03 You said the key phrase - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:42:19 01/06/03 Re: You said the key phrase - BigRob 00:54:30 01/06/03 Re: Re: You said the key phrase - BigRob 01:18:02 01/06/03 Cuda :) My first car Was 440/six pac Challenger (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:23:33 01/06/03 Been posting this all day along :) ( lol ) - ZBlacktt 00:56:41 01/06/03 Re: Been posting this all day along :) ( lol ) - BigRob 01:06:43 01/06/03 Are you still going to sell it next year? :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 01:17:45 01/06/03 Re: Are you still going to sell it next year? :) - BigRob 01:23:06 01/06/03 After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL - ZBlacktt 01:33:24 01/06/03 Oh god, you had to go there. Sorry Rob but I told you :) (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 08:16:15 01/06/03 Re: After reading your site, I can see 400rwhp now,,LOL - BigRob 13:28:46 01/06/03 Well, it looks like stock turbo dyno.....lol - ZBlacktt 15:59:38 01/06/03 Re: Well, it looks like stock turbo dyno.....lol - BigRob 22:19:05 01/06/03 LOL - I hardly call 16.8 PSI pushed to the limit - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:10:12 01/06/03 I was unaware of the biiger bore, - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:23:50 01/06/03 Agreed - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:27:11 01/06/03 and............ - ZBlacktt 00:31:49 01/06/03 Dude, we're not flaming you. It's good to see that stock Z's - dilo 01:08:21 01/06/03 I think the correction factor gives bogus readings. - Marshall 03:33:07 01/06/03 How many times you going to post about correction factors? (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 08:17:16 01/06/03 Until idiots like you stop overlooking the basics. (n/m) - Marshall 21:42:21 01/06/03 Bwahahahahaa, good one. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 23:05:04 01/06/03 (That was just a cheap shot) - Marshall 01:04:59 01/07/03 yea didn't give it a thought until now....im sure thats what - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 12:02:40 01/06/03 YEP! Been there, done that, seen it several times. (n/m) - spotz 23:58:08 01/05/03 ok,ok is this that same Z with J-Spec motor from today? - ZBlacktt 22:40:36 01/05/03 No!!! - GRVNZ 22:53:10 01/05/03 Great,,,LOL, you've just busted one liar from there :( (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:43:03 01/05/03 That's great. I was only able to manage 375rwhp (n/m) - Mike (La Canada) 22:44:41 01/05/03 TRI Z Racing- Denver, Colorado - GRVNZ 23:35:18 01/05/03 Seems kinda funny huh? - Lu87zxt 00:46:22 01/06/03 Well, he's second fastest :) and no there's not 40RWHP more - ZBlacktt 13:06:55 01/06/03 Excellent! How much torque? - degradated 22:53:33 01/05/03 468.5lb/ft of torque!!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 22:56:54 01/05/03 damn! (n/m) - degradated 23:05:51 01/05/03 That is amazing. My math says 491 fwhp. On stock turbos and - dilo 22:59:44 01/05/03 I got 489.7Hp, but yea, 370cc injectors huh?,, :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 23:03:09 01/05/03 1994-95 Models Stronger??? - GRVNZ 23:17:15 01/05/03 Way back in '95 i heard from one Nissan tech - sasha 23:57:26 01/05/03 thank you!!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 00:10:37 01/06/03 That has NOTHING to do with power potential with stock turbo - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:20:34 01/06/03 Sales pitch for that year :) (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:28:34 01/06/03 Sounds like someone is playing with the correction factor (n/m) - MikeH(Twin GT35BB Incon Z) 00:35:12 01/06/03 I Think it is a record also! - GRVNZ 23:14:33 01/05/03 oh so its NOT your car LOL? - SteamyZ(ZtoyZ.NET) 00:18:10 01/06/03 415.7rwhp@468.5lb/ft torque!! (n/m) - GRVNZ 23:22:42 01/05/03 what mods did it have? and how cold was it? (n/m) - hypo 00:17:59 01/06/03 Woody! Can you back this up, or dispute it? (n/m) - Chip(GinnMotorsports) 00:25:19 01/06/03 Which part? Lol. - Woody75 (Denver) 08:28:04 01/06/03 Bogus correction factors. - Marshall 03:35:40 01/06/03 Hey, let it be. - sparkie 13:37:33 01/06/03 Yea,,lol. As long as no one post a 10sec @ 130 on stockers (n/m) - ZBlacktt 16:02:27 01/06/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.